From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=C2=AC?= notation for not? Ref: Add a couple cells to lisp-prettify-symbols-alist Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:57:35 +0300 Message-ID: <838tx9fsm8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160710052404.GA28783@holos.localdomain> <20160710054725.GA29331@holos.localdomain> <52190d8b-e3b2-55cd-f8ef-eba847bba707@online.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468162714 17851 80.91.229.3 (10 Jul 2016 14:58:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 10 16:58:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGBl-0002c0-EP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:58:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55503 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGBk-00055s-NT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:58:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGB1-00055k-3a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:57:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGAw-0002Sk-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:57:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGAw-0002Se-Oa; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:57:42 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2872 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bMGAt-0008El-Lw; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 10:57:40 -0400 In-reply-to: <52190d8b-e3b2-55cd-f8ef-eba847bba707@online.de> (message from Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= on Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:31:56 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205500 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Röhler > Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:31:56 +0200 > > Hi Mark, > > while your initiative is appreciated, AFAIK these symbols are not that > canonic. > > Implementing in core might draw subsequent requests suggesting the one > or the other symbols instead, IMO keeping the pretty-print stuff in > specialized packages is recommendable. It's an optional feature: emacs -Q M-: prettify-symbols-mode RET => nil