From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24091: 24.5; High CPU usage at startup while hidden Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 19:05:31 +0300 Message-ID: <838tv5au9g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <24533f31-9fc2-b38e-aaeb-561616cdf77f@gmail.com> <87shut9pyk.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83lh0lq9n5.fsf@gnu.org> <83oa5fp1zb.fsf@gnu.org> <877fbkw7b1.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <83inv1fnf9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zinodghv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y438de6m.fsf@gnu.org> <57CBCE4F.5040705@gmx.at> <57CC1E5F.8010107@gmx.at> <57CC4435.7040503@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473178194 30709 195.159.176.226 (6 Sep 2016 16:09:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 16:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acairncross@gmail.com, clement.pit@gmail.com, 24091@debbugs.gnu.org To: Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 06 18:09:50 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIwQ-0006q5-AY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 18:09:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIwO-0005qh-6C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:09:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIsx-0003Iq-SN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIss-0005Xb-GV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:06:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIss-0005XX-DO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIss-00038i-4G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2016 16:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24091 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 24091-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24091.147317795312053 (code B ref 24091); Tue, 06 Sep 2016 16:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24091) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Sep 2016 16:05:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51563 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIsj-00038L-0s for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60805) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIsg-000387-UW for 24091@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIsX-0005Su-V6 for 24091@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:05:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:56783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIsX-0005Si-Lr; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:05:41 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4302 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bhIsV-0004xA-OY; Tue, 06 Sep 2016 12:05:40 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Noam Postavsky on Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:21:20 -0400) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:123022 Archived-At: > From: Noam Postavsky > Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 12:21:20 -0400 > Cc: Aiken , > Clément Pit--Claudel , > 24091@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 11:56 AM, martin rudalics wrote: > > In x_make_frame_visible we have this loop: > > > > while (!FRAME_VISIBLE_P (f)) > > > > What I wanted to know is whether the frame f here is the _same_ frame > > you see in x_top_window_to_frame where IIUC > > > > if (wdesc == XtWindow (x->widget)) > > return f; > > Oh, I see. Yes, it is the same frame. Maybe we should stop waiting after some time has passed, like 0.5 sec. Does that work in this case? Does the frame always appears within half a second when workspaces are not involved? Thanks.