From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mouse-wheel-scroll Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:22:59 +0300 Message-ID: <838tnl63fg.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tw6b5vm4.fsf@gnu.org> <20170330.140716.518256554.tkk@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83o9wi637e.fsf@gnu.org> <82863D66-6F78-472B-8B19-74CF469EE5B1@misasa.okayama-u.ac.jp> <83k27654sa.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1cx6fiv.fsf@gnu.org> <83a8816cl8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1490963111 3944 195.159.176.226 (31 Mar 2017 12:25:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 31 14:25:06 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ctvbx-00008P-OG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:25:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40708 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctvc3-00075E-Kq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctva3-0005x6-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctvZy-00008X-Ds for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58671) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ctvZy-00008S-8x; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:22:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2600 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ctvZx-0002BE-GK; Fri, 31 Mar 2017 08:22:57 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Dani Moncayo on Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:24:33 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213556 Archived-At: > From: Dani Moncayo > Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 11:24:33 +0200 > Cc: Emacs development discussions > > ?? You said this: > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> From: Kaushal Modi > >> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:22:36 +0000 > >> > >> mouse-wheel-scroll-amount '(1 ((shift) . 5) ((control) . nil)) > >> mouse-wheel-progressive-speed nil > >> > >> FWIW, I like the suggested default change too. I anyways had the progressive speed set to nil in my config. > > > > It is strange that you-all say that, while for me the defaults work > > quite well. > > So, if the defaults work quite well for you, I conclude that your vote > is against changing them. No, it doesn't mean that. I was just saying that for me Emacs behaves as advertised: scrolls by 5 lines each click of the wheel. I didn't express any opinion for or against changing the default scroll size. Please note that the OP explicitly said the defaults scroll much more than they should on their machine. > The recipe is: visit a (large enough) file and scroll through it by > spinning the wheel of the mouse quickly enough (e.g. 4 "wheel steps" > in half of a second approx.). Maybe you can't reproduce this on your > environment, I don't know. In all the environments I've done that, > the scrolling is too fast and accelerated. I can't imagine who may > want that behavior, but maybe there are some people who do. In any > case, it seems clear that most people don't what this feature, hence > it should be disabled by default. Thanks, I will try that.