From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33002: 26.1; EWW sends unspecific "Accept: */*" header Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 19:27:11 +0200 Message-ID: <838t28eosw.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1541353241 18268 195.159.176.226 (4 Nov 2018 17:40:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 17:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33002@debbugs.gnu.org, winston@ml1.net To: Federico Tedin Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 04 18:40:37 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMO4-0004ff-Rg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 18:40:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59728 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMQB-0002Ce-Do for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:42:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMPj-0001IZ-8A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:42:22 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBt-0006kM-Vv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:28:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBt-0006kD-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:28:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBt-0003Q6-Lx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:28:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33002 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33002-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33002.154135246013117 (code B ref 33002); Sun, 04 Nov 2018 17:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33002) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Nov 2018 17:27:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBY-0003PV-0q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50649) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBW-0003PJ-Ji for 33002@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:27:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBG-0006E7-5o for 33002@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:27:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60905) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBF-0006Dx-UG; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:27:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4863 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gJMBD-0005A4-M1; Sun, 04 Nov 2018 12:27:21 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Federico Tedin on Sun, 4 Nov 2018 00:15:38 -0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152022 Archived-At: > From: Federico Tedin > Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 00:15:38 -0300 > Cc: 33002@debbugs.gnu.org > > I've created a small patch which introduces a new variable, its value is > used as the value for the 'Accept' HTTP header in requests created by EWW. > As the default value I chose to use the same Lynx uses. Does it really make sense to make this a customizable option? How would an average user choose a value for this option? I think EWW should decide by itself what header to send. Thanks.