From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33398: 26.1, netbsd-8; Hi Lock Faces, Hi Green B, default setting suggestion Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 09:32:43 +0200 Message-ID: <838t1ce3tw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9B715204-BE6D-4F02-B484-1EA9EDACE0EB@scratch.space> <87wope15gh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <4D07BB6C-98A9-4EC2-BB37-097D5D753E53@scratch.space> <87wopbzeuy.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87d0r04tmg.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87sgzv747k.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <740AF1DA-7EDB-4310-8C6E-F7944D714513@scratch.space> <87sgzuca5o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87a7m0hi5t.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837eh4gpjd.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7lyi29o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837eh1jeak.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1l0c3be.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83h8g3j0aa.fsf@gnu.org> <87y39fmnbn.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83mupvgj18.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2f6hzf1.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87ftvkssxh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543476669 1156 195.159.176.226 (29 Nov 2018 07:31:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: van@scratch.space, 33398@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 29 08:31:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGmt-00006e-SS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 08:31:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52651 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGp0-0001m0-CV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:33:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58012) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGoo-0001dt-Tu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGoo-0002Im-14 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49778) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGon-0002IL-QA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGon-0006eQ-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:33:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33398 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33398-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33398.154347676525543 (code B ref 33398); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 07:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33398) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2018 07:32:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54036 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGoW-0006du-Q7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:32:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48082) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGoU-0006di-FN for 33398@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:32:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGoK-0001mR-Mr for 33398@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:32:37 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGoK-0001mC-G6; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:32:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3193 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gSGoJ-0003El-U9; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 02:32:32 -0500 In-reply-to: <87ftvkssxh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:06:50 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152880 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: Van L , 33398@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 01:06:50 +0200 > > >>> Maybe something like this, but I'm not sure because the red background would > >>> be too glaring on 88 colors, but more readable orchid1 is not quite red. > >> > >> Is OrangeRed better? > > > > OrangeRed is not better than red, but simply Orange looks much better, > > so a new face could be named hi-orange. > > After trying to use Orange, I see it's too saturated, that is bad for > light backgrounds. But I found a much better color: Gold. It is still > related to red because gold can be reddish in an alloy with copper. I don't see how "gold" can be translated to "red", sorry. It translates to yellow shades on both 8- and 16-color TTYs, as expected. Did you try "IndianRed" instead?