From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34394: 27.0.50; Emacs segfaults with SLY, company and C-g Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 16:48:28 +0200 Message-ID: <838sypnhkz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87va1tye42.fsf@gmail.com> <83wom9o0hu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2chxpli.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1i9nugh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mun5xko7.fsf@gmail.com> <83h8ddnouf.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftsxnnug.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm3lxgr4.fsf@gmail.com> <83ef8hnm38.fsf@gnu.org> <877ee9xfid.fsf@gmail.com> <83bm3lnkfh.fsf@gnu.org> <8736oxxdsg.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="112113"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34394@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 09 15:50:15 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTxN-000T3I-Vr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 15:50:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46300 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTxM-000882-Tm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTxD-000870-5b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:50:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTxC-0006xv-FD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTxC-0006xE-Al for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTxC-0003CM-3L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34394 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34394-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34394.154972374212221 (code B ref 34394); Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34394) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Feb 2019 14:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40639 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTwD-0003As-IF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39616) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTwB-0003AY-Id for 34394@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51437) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTw3-0005j7-33; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:48:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4593 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gsTw2-0003l5-EY; Sat, 09 Feb 2019 09:48:50 -0500 In-reply-to: <8736oxxdsg.fsf@gmail.com> (message from =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= on Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:00:15 +0000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155314 Archived-At: > From: João Távora > Cc: 34394@debbugs.gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org > Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 14:00:15 +0000 > > > Removing the need for having SLY or eglot would be a major > > simplification. Then investigating this could be easier. > > Yeah, I understand that. What do you suggest, though? I would start by > writing a completion-at-point-function that uses a dummy process? > That's a bit non-trivial, though not impossible, since all the filter, > sentinel and such have to be coded. If a completion function that uses a process is necessary, then I guess it's unreasonable to try to avoid it. However, I'd like to avoid installing CL. Can you provide instructions for doing this with eglot instead (assuming its installation is more lightweight)? > But is it so you can reproduce it yourself, or some other reason I'm not > seeing? The former.