From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34847: 27.0.50; auto-revert-buffers occasionally selects a killed buffer Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 09:39:15 +0300 Message-ID: <838swnbpt8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ftqvlwxy.fsf@tcd.ie> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="161329"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 34847@debbugs.gnu.org, dale@codefu.org To: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 06 08:47:24 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hCf6q-000ftN-Ld for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 08:47:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51387 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCf6p-0000tT-FO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:47:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59875) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCf6j-0000sT-GI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCezi-0004Mj-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32945) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCezi-0004MZ-Fj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hCezi-0002ip-77 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 06:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34847 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 34847-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34847.155453277910428 (code B ref 34847); Sat, 06 Apr 2019 06:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Apr 2019 06:39:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46489 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hCezL-0002i8-8J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:39:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44271) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hCezG-0002hq-DF for 34847@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:39:35 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36971) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCezA-00043a-8X; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:39:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4607 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hCez9-0005ec-Li; Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:39:28 -0400 In-reply-to: <87ftqvlwxy.fsf@tcd.ie> (contovob@tcd.ie) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:157247 Archived-At: > From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" > Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 02:55:05 +0100 > Cc: 34847@debbugs.gnu.org > > But instrumenting get-buffer-create and kill-buffer revealed that > kill-buffer-hook wasn't run sometimes, specifically when an > uninitialised inhibit_buffer_hooks happened to be non-zero. > > Eli, is the following TRT? Yes. Sorry, for some reason I assumed that the entire buffer struct is zeroed when a buffer is allocated, but I see now that was based on some dream, not on facts.