From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "Bringing GNU Emacs to Native Code" at the European Lisp Symposium Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:02:21 +0300 Message-ID: <838siez8ya.fsf@gnu.org> References: <69d8b48d-bd09-41c1-a89d-ed76fe0284a4@default> <83imhi22ot.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="32671"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, drew.adams@oracle.com, akrl@sdf.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 29 16:09:45 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jTnPF-0008P3-7d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:09:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34256 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTnPE-0001BQ-74 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTnIS-00054u-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:02:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:55598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTnIQ-0005ed-IN; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:02:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1948 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jTnIO-0001QY-1z; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:02:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:38:25 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248136 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, akrl@sdf.org, stefan@marxist.se, > emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:38:25 -0400 > > Maybe we should stop talking about our language dialects being either > "dynamically scoped" or "lexically scoped" because it's reductive and > just talk about Elisp/d (the dialect where all bindings are dynamically > scoped by default, except those using `lexical-let`) and Elisp/l (the > dialect where all bindings are lexically scoped by default except those > applied to vars that have been declared as dynamically scoped)? If that's what you meant, then the intent is clear.