From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43866: 26.3; italian postfix additions Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:50:56 +0300 Message-ID: <838sc0opzz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83tuv47vkn.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft6igdzi.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <837drt1qta.fsf@gnu.org> <874kmx443u.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83k0vszw0e.fsf@gnu.org> <87d01kvbnj.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83wnzsxln9.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnzmgd1f.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83mu0hng0d.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4828"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43866@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 20 17:51:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtuo-00018O-Ty for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:51:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46522 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtun-0008RG-VV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35584) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtug-0008OA-A3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtug-000306-0I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtuf-0003HX-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43866 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43866-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43866.160320905512594 (code B ref 43866); Tue, 20 Oct 2020 15:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43866) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2020 15:50:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46439 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtuY-0003H3-N4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56954) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtuX-0003Gr-AL for 43866@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:57924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtuR-0002tn-NN; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:50:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1960 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kUtuR-00011Q-4k; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 11:50:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Robert Pluim on Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:47:12 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191104 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: Juri Linkov , 43866@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 16:47:12 +0200 > > Eli> The implementation seems to rely on a file in the /usr/include tree > Eli> that might not be there. This is a significant disadvantage, IMO. It > Eli> means that, unlike all other similar facilities in Emacs, this one is > Eli> not self-contained. > > Eli> Is it possible to lift this limitation? > > Aren't all those definitions in lisp/term/x-win.el anyway? Probably. But even that is sub-optimal (though better than reading a /usr/include file): it is only available on X. What about TTY sessions, what about w32?