From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45184: 26.1; Private Unicode plains 15 and 16 seem not supported Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:06:54 +0200 Message-ID: <838sa31gox.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87v9d8mdlk.fsf@mimuw.edu.pl> <83k0to14uu.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft4b7di4.fsf@mimuw.edu.pl> <83czzf1n88.fsf@gnu.org> <878sa3pfy2.fsf@mimuw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18018"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 45184@debbugs.gnu.org To: jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 12 11:08:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1oz-0004bS-MT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 11:08:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45638 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1oy-00024C-JI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1oo-000245-35 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60629) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1on-0002gW-Sb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1on-0004wI-OR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:08:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45184 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45184-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45184.160776763618928 (code B ref 45184); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 10:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45184) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Dec 2020 10:07:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43942 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1o3-0004vD-VS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54634) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1o2-0004v0-DI for 45184@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:07:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1nx-0002P6-9z; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:07:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2588 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ko1nw-0008Lg-JW; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 05:07:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <878sa3pfy2.fsf@mimuw.edu.pl> (jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195829 Archived-At: > From: jsbien@mimuw.edu.pl (Janusz S. Bień) > Cc: 45184@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 09:49:09 +0100 > > On Sat, Dec 12 2020 at 9:45 +02, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > [...] > > >> I think the Emacs code just for some reason limits the range of the > >> Unicode characters, and the limitation should be removed. > > > > Any evidence that such a limitation exists and/or where does it > > happen? > > The chacters are not displayed despite the fact that the appropriate > font is selected explicitely. I meant evidence that the root cause of this is some limitation on the range of Unicode characters. There's no dispute about the facts, but I'm not aware of any limitation of the kind that you suggested. Also, please describe in detail how you selected the font in question. I don't think you told that in your original report.