From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: font-lock-fontify-block Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 16:51:09 +0200 Message-ID: <838s6sl92a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6sbg41o.fsf@gnus.org> <87lfatirk1.fsf@gnus.org> <83blbpmy2x.fsf@gnu.org> <837dmdmw60.fsf@gnu.org> <831rclmoy0.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgz9l9xw.fsf@gnu.org> <30f0a4188eb516fc37ed@heytings.org> <83wnucltxe.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc602598836e8f@heytings.org> <83im5wlfdo.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc606c8f42ec5b@heytings.org> <83blbolecr.fsf@gnu.org> <496380cc60f6305b9405@heytings.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1842"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 12 15:52:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lKj9b-0000O8-JH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:52:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56276 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKj9a-0002Ym-KT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:52:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKj8A-0001G8-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:51:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52645) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lKj8A-0002z1-5S; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:51:10 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3877 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lKj87-0001S2-Hn; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:51:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <496380cc60f6305b9405@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:40:19 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266401 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:40:19 +0000 > From: Gregory Heytings > cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > >> I understand that you find the "C-x x f" not as convenient as "M-o > >> M-o", although it seems to me that for a not-often-used command, that > >> binding could be okay, but that's just me. What do you think of the > >> "C-M-|" binding I proposed? > > > > It's slightly better, although having to press 3 modifier keys isn't > > easy. Plus, it doesn't work on TTY frames. > > If you believe this command is widely used I don't see how my beliefs are relevant here, sorry. > and needs a short key binding that can be used both in GUI and TTY > frames, one of the other free keys could be used for that purpose. > For example C-x C-a, or C-x C-y, or M-". C-x C-a is used in GUD, so it's a non-starter.