From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display scaling? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 15:33:23 +0200 Message-ID: <838rv2hba4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877danm1ds.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <877danm1ds.fsf@yahoo.com> <83o83yhcxt.fsf@gnu.org> <8735lamyad.fsf@yahoo.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32248"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 14:58:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCioo-0008Fk-1s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:58:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43746 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCiom-0007UE-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 08:58:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCiQX-0006TY-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 08:33:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=59154 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCiQW-0006Wi-M4; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 08:33:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=CCw/GKDbsw85Lkp0y6ckvAx1t/l8d5fMxPSBIhR+Jyc=; b=m+oCh1PM70jE Mw1apmqzqE9QS01Q5utkkcvMjig2tr6x96lcGKypp/pLtVTevfHaLWIB4n68ptugEAbZd79R48ar3 rbNxjCmhtoud+J5cJHWd8dSuCJeXrvIvBkQOMLGbzwcAozvd1bkorHL6wMqjyMYDvMj38UPEbRZe2 hG3B00WdJeqvJ0YXi4M0U1dCdmdICOL5CfCPVVZaNW66thac/MvzqfbHAXXg0CNGhGQ/Tzn1R09B4 5m5f5tFDpEXaLuJIiRlKYuqis9hJ9N63q1UQiEsYyra146l7sBfPSLg2OEDXTFGaz3U/c3lzclpa7 xE37YPX9YjgP0GuVkrYvhw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1587 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCiQV-0001Eb-7N; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 08:33:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8735lamyad.fsf@yahoo.com> (message from Po Lu on Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:17:30 +0800) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285427 Archived-At: > From: Po Lu > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:17:30 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > What is your plan to scaling the fringe bitmaps? > > We should scale the bitmaps by the same factor by which the fringe width > is scaled, which is what happens on the NS and PGTK ports when a device > scale is applied. It will require some code on the window system > backend side, but not too much. But bitmap images don't scale well, they look ugly (pixelated) after scaling.