From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xref-query-replace-in-results error message after xref-find-definitions, was: Re: bug#58158: 29.0.50; [overlay] Interval tree iteration considered harmful Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:21:00 +0300 Message-ID: <838rllch4z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zgehe6iq.fsf@gnu.org> <95113379-99d8-eba4-f980-a7fca11430d5@yandex.ru> <834jwfmn5a.fsf@gnu.org> <838rlohzeo.fsf@gnu.org> <83mta2g91p.fsf@gnu.org> <237a3e26-03b8-a2a9-90bd-d50c3670a131@yandex.ru> <83wn96efyn.fsf@gnu.org> <5bb803bf-f51b-c175-f908-c60066d6967d@yandex.ru> <83v8oqeeqf.fsf@gnu.org> <7c0849be-145e-e073-49b5-63749e8d8282@yandex.ru> <83sfjuecyw.fsf@gnu.org> <83k056e4dz.fsf@gnu.org> <83h70ae23f.fsf@gnu.org> <21c2aec6-ee5e-c794-de3c-808356e72eb9@yandex.ru> <831qrdei3t.fsf@gnu.org> <49D388CD-276D-44EA-A34E-1BD9562770A2@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19730"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Yates Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 12 15:23:10 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oibhU-0004uz-Ky for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 15:23:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59176 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oibhT-0003Ge-LP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32888) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oibfG-0001Sx-4R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:20:50 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41134) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oibfF-0001Jn-Go; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:20:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=rnrtdhMSUlW0VsW6E+dHjHKGas38fVU3GLhOT401CvQ=; b=CmTCqdkHSL8P T9m7RXtEjRLWmDSsm9QoCus5odKSvJ/3flqi7nW3Dy6Ovb9lm+NdpNSmEDjbabhdCcPnQdR8mqz8m 4uZ9QnEQCUNIvmLu4yvDVInoqenlAmp98pZwQ7dt1GBZEMSSlhQu4ltVRr/4JzBtnrLLihuOkPGaj 4AwXDiPoy5VyCeEZo6kGcNnwsf9SxGzV3G5ygkFpjVGnOz8gasyBfgTCd4iwGmO874Na/P7rO9PL1 d9B/Y/EmQPDs/k2X0ueykwliDucEhwLggxR9aFf0KwMy9m5KjLVUOitmn4TxzSp8rlZcC7ZD05EXH Sbwe5G9/wxajY7IxVcY9sA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=4139 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oibfF-00027L-0C; Wed, 12 Oct 2022 09:20:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from John Yates on Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:49:06 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297603 Archived-At: > From: John Yates > Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2022 07:49:06 -0400 > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 6:17 AM Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > On October 12, 2022 1:06:22 PM GMT+03:00, John Yates wrote: > > > . . . Perhaps 'full', 'complete', 'total', 'universal', or some such. > > > > We are talking about "global replacement", yes? > > Yes we are. And, IIUC, your point is that the concept of > "global replacement" is comparably embedded in software > development. Hmm... Not only that, the replacements (pun intended) you proposed don't seem to fit this context. What synonyms of "global replacement" exist that don't use the word "global"? P.S. I restored the CC to emacs-devel on the assumption that you omitted it by accident; apologies if that was intentional.