From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#62720: 29.0.60; Not easy at all to upgrade :core packages like Eglot Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 11:37:44 +0300 Message-ID: <838retee1z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5zj2vfo.fsf@gmail.com> <83sfd5761f.fsf@gnu.org> <87zg7djrgr.fsf@gmail.com> <83o7nt73za.fsf@gnu.org> <83mt3d73c2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r0sptinq.fsf@posteo.net> <83jzyh706c.fsf@gnu.org> <875ya1tdwf.fsf@posteo.net> <83edop6sdy.fsf@gnu.org> <831qkp6o0i.fsf@gnu.org> <83wn2h5825.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn2gkhzr.fsf@posteo.net> <83cz485oxi.fsf@gnu.org> <87leiwdyff.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5zblspg.fsf@posteo.net> <83ildz4vu7.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt3bk31e.fsf@posteo.net> <83r0smg2a6.fsf@gnu.org> <87pm86pgda.fsf@posteo.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33626"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 15 10:38:17 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbQG-0008WS-Fn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 10:38:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbQ3-0004is-Pp; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbQ2-0004ij-Vf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbQ2-0000bM-NU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbQ2-0002oN-JJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 62720 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 62720-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B62720.168154787410792 (code B ref 62720); Sat, 15 Apr 2023 08:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 62720) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2023 08:37:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48197 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbPt-0002nz-Q8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:37:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43890) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbPs-0002nm-5Q for 62720@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:37:52 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbPl-0000Wx-3a; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:37:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=x9zxa8mTwsj5Aze3E8o0VC+FOHzth6GdmFfOIfdceoA=; b=FfU8t5+z4tCM /XNLNuJXb6pPTaq0OSWNfzjUJzFm2VgTsAUwEW6n7BSbOy8DNxDJmeOShOoSdXhd6SO0kmybqtrEq neW0EZAwE3gCcrlb78FnZuwHkH+6V+0WxdbRvFhCf+vhUzl2+eIJHXJ6Zp2tK9GBEUySfpYaHci5r 9lBA4DB2eoA8LlCOrE4BSVvdc/ocdK0yzT+wPcgyrqiYfx2WeW2m7ZuQPkUkiK+g0pjy3yEz9HWaH MgxZ4i7Nw2qt+5KKEjX/hFSeYX41j65dERqA9K8uXG86YDuLnt/pGVVOYpPyDx/scCZzR3FJ5MUWK Vcv0t13Jt/lmWzsVUAIIqA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pnbPk-0003eR-1t; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 04:37:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pm86pgda.fsf@posteo.net> (message from Philip Kaludercic on Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:40:01 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:260004 Archived-At: > From: Philip Kaludercic > Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 62720@debbugs.gnu.org, > larsi@gnus.org > Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2023 16:40:01 +0000 > > > Hmm... looks identical to the previous patch you sent, which changes > > package-install? Or what am I missing? > > > > As for the question I asked: I'm okay with changing package-install if > > there are no objections from those who proposed to change > > package-upgrade instead. > > Did I send the wrong patch. I double-checked now and this one should be > using package-update: Thanks. It doesn't seem to be simpler than the change in package-install, perhaps even more complex than that. What is your preference? change package-install or package-update? I tend to the former.