From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr protocol? Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:53:45 +0200 Message-ID: <837hq9y2ja.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20100219.071808.112831897.wl@gnu.org> <87bpflzqm4.fsf@red-bean.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1266573373 18732 80.91.229.12 (19 Feb 2010 09:56:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 19 10:56:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiPah-0006kd-DO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:56:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33313 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiPag-0003VC-T7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NiPaJ-0003FS-D7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:55:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43032 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NiPaH-0003DP-BF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiPaG-0004m9-FT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:48779) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NiPaG-0004lr-1x; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:55:40 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KY300300233YN00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:55:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.213.68]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KY30027S28PF540@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:55:38 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87bpflzqm4.fsf@red-bean.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121222 Archived-At: > From: Karl Fogel > Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:28:19 -0500 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Werner LEMBERG writes: > >Is there any progress in adding the bzr protocol to Savannah to make > >pulling quicker and consuming less bandwidth? > > Not yet. At some point, when I've discharged certain current > responsibilities, I may join the Savannah admins in helping maintain > Bazaar, and I would try to push this forward then. (But I'm very much > hoping someone can do it before then, because it will probably be weeks > before I can join.) That's very sad. It's been 6 weeks since I requested the Savannah admins to set this up (and Richard backed me up), and now we are told there will be weeks more to wait. I really have hard time to believe that it's such a hard job that we need to wait several months for it to be done.