From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs-23 release branch Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:58:07 +0200 Message-ID: <837hpk2h5c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zl2g24xy.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3zc2iqr.fsf@gnu.org> <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1268244079 6138 80.91.229.12 (10 Mar 2010 18:01:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:01:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 10 19:01:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpQDa-0005uI-WA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:01:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59193 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpQDa-0002DQ-EH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NpQDV-0002C6-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:01:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=59255 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NpQCo-00014y-4M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:01:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpQC3-0005i1-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:00:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:63953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NpQBD-0005ay-1T; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:58:47 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZ200E00UYGDC00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:58:06 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.34.234]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZ2008AGV8REMG0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:58:04 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87eijsoz6u.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121780 Archived-At: > From: David Kastrup > Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:29 +0100 > > >> * Bidi support (Eli). > > > > Does this mean it is okay to merge my local bidi branch with mainline > > any time I feel like it? > > Wouldn't it make more sense to push your local bidi branch as a branch > first? I don't mind. That's why I asked the question in the first place. However, given my explanation in the other mail just sent, what would be the advantage of having a branch, rather than merging with the trunk?