From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: next emacs version? Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:39:46 +0200 Message-ID: <837hp7idyl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56D10E2523764AC98D99CEBC55DBAD93@us.oracle.com> <83iq8sigyq.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3z0i3nu.fsf@gnu.org> <911BA1D06CEB4306924D0069BA2D3DFF@us.oracle.com> <83bpeki18a.fsf@gnu.org> <83aau4hv38.fsf@gnu.org> <0E10B96B5C814EE8B95B57972F13E189@us.oracle.com> <87sk7v1whq.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1269074496 9397 80.91.229.12 (20 Mar 2010 08:41:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:41:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 20 09:41:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsuFP-0004qK-9h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:41:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38715 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsuFO-0007Eh-LZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:41:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NsuDX-0006hM-Dd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:39:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36417 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NsuDV-0006gy-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:39:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsuDU-0002f7-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:39:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:44334) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NsuDU-0002ev-1l; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 04:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KZK00D00O0PZT00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:39:30 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.70.182.236]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KZK009VWO1T2DA0@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:39:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87sk7v1whq.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:122351 Archived-At: > From: Jason Rumney > Cc: "'Eli Zaretskii'" , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:51:29 +0800 > > "Drew Adams" writes: > > > OK in this particular case, but the general question remains. If this > > change had been made in a 23.0.50.1 dev version (or whatever the > > nomenclature is), then some such dev versions would have the change > > and some would not. > > It's a transient problem that is not worth worrying about. Users who > build from development sources will update and rebuild soon anyway. Right. And because of this, I think testing with version< against the last officially released version would be good enough.