From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8119: 24.0.50; `mark-active' needs its doc string Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:08:55 +0200 Message-ID: <837hcmq1dk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <80D7750819194368B9899655D0AB5C9B@us.oracle.com> <19816.12136.85156.254849@fencepost.gnu.org> <56705938E5E64BB9880882471D813B12@us.oracle.com> <43C9C32D8540491CBBB509D57B314DB4@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298734619 32454 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2011 15:36:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8119@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 16:36:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMCV-00036g-0B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:36:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43629 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtMCU-0001MG-FM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:36:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37810 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtMCN-0001LO-JA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:36:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMCM-0006KX-Ah for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:36:47 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37659) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtMCM-0006KT-7h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:36:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLlW-0005y1-Eh; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8119 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8119-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8119.129873293922928 (code B ref 8119); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8119) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2011 15:08:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLlS-0005xl-Pu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:08:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLlQ-0005xZ-SH for 8119@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:08:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LH800700CMWT600@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 8119@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:08:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.53.157]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LH80057KCQPTVP0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 17:08:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <43C9C32D8540491CBBB509D57B314DB4@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:09:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44386 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 06:18:55 -0800 > Cc: > > > But rest assured I won't interfere with any more of your > > reports, at all. > > Think of my argument as a question, if you like: What is the policy wrt > retitling? I think Glenn's arguments are entirely valid. If there needs to be policy, Glenn is the first one we should ask, because he does most of the mundane work with the bug-tracker. FWIW, I see no harm at all in retitling, and I do see a certain value in having the title express the essence of the bug report.