From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11519: "Wrong type argument: characterp" building custom-deps while boostrapping Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 20:02:14 +0300 Message-ID: <837gw2ygo9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762bn56ok.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337792615 27071 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2012 17:03:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@linux-m68k.org, 11519@debbugs.gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 23 19:03:33 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SXEy5-0007rs-4b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 19:03:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXEy4-0001t7-Mq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 13:03:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXExy-0001Zo-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 13:03:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXExt-0003Sk-1Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 13:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59537) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SXExs-0003Ru-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 13:03:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXEyf-0008SX-Rc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 13:04:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:04:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11519 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11519-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11519.133779261732487 (code B ref 11519); Wed, 23 May 2012 17:04:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11519) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 May 2012 17:03:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40850 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXEyG-0008Rw-Nd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 13:03:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:38850) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SXExv-0008RP-SM for 11519@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 13:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0M4H00B00IPKU200@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 11519@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 May 2012 20:02:03 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.210.75]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0M4H00BPHJBDF0B0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 23 May 2012 20:02:02 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60313 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, lekktu@gmail.com, 11519@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 11:27:16 -0400 > > We could suppress relocation all the time. I suspect that will increase the probability of out-of-memory conditions due to fragmentation, and system-wide memory pressure in general, on those platforms that do use ralloc.c today.