From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12426: 24.2.50; Emacs is closed unexpectedly after query-replace Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:39:47 +0300 Message-ID: <837grzw0ek.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347475228 2158 80.91.229.3 (12 Sep 2012 18:40:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12426@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 12 20:40:30 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrrR-0008BO-No for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:40:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43944 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrrO-0007Sq-5H for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56303) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrrL-0007QR-1m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:40:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrrE-0000RT-0r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrrD-0000Qv-Tq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrry-0000W3-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:41:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12426 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12426-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12426.13474752541970 (code B ref 12426); Wed, 12 Sep 2012 18:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12426) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2012 18:40:54 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrrq-0000Vi-Ag for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:40:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:53048) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TBrrk-0000VV-KC for 12426@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 14:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MA900K002DGZS00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 12426@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:39:36 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MA900K9V2HZZX00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 21:39:36 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:64207 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:06:03 +0200 > From: Dani Moncayo > > Recipe from emacs -Q: a b M-a M-% a b c > > After doing that, my Emacs session suddenly ends. It exits due to an assertion violation. Looks like the recent changes that introduced fatal_error_backtrace are a misfeature on Windows. I'm looking at the reason for the assertion violation; the fatal_error_backtrace thingy is next.