From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12541: Prefer plain 'static' to 'static inline'. Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:57:53 +0200 Message-ID: <837grbec5a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5067FC19.3000704@cs.ucla.edu> <83d313et6t.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5jr7fw7.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349020726 9538 80.91.229.3 (30 Sep 2012 15:58:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 12541@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 30 17:58:51 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TILur-00037y-Jl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:58:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58060 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TILum-0007q1-Ar for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:58:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TILuj-0007pu-VW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:58:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TILuj-0002up-2v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TILui-0002ul-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:58:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TILv4-0008Th-2d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12541 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 12541-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12541.134902069432531 (code B ref 12541); Sun, 30 Sep 2012 15:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12541) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2012 15:58:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34811 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TILuI-0008Sd-GL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:58:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:50731) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TILuG-0008ST-8D for 12541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 11:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MB6002006OSR800@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 12541@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:57:49 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MB6002E070CQJ30@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:57:49 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87y5jr7fw7.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:65027 Archived-At: > From: Jason Rumney > Cc: Paul Eggert , 12541@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 22:18:48 +0800 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > The inline functions in bidi.c _must_ be inlined for performance > > reasons. If the only way to make sure they are is to make them > > external, then so be it. > > The only way to ensure they are inlined is to make them macros. Modern > compilers treat "inline" as a hint, not an instruction, if they take any > notice of it at all. In general, you are right. But I would settle with getting the right result in practice. Surely, for GCC at least the information must be there.