From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: the state of the concurrency branch Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:58:23 +0300 Message-ID: <837gf6fm34.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vc2t7erx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83txicffpe.fsf@gnu.org> <87haeb3lwp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <83mwo3f762.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9k2fo0x.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1377665903 22600 80.91.229.3 (28 Aug 2013 04:58:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 04:58:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: tromey@redhat.com, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 28 06:58:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VEXpo-0008M4-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:58:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEXpo-0004Jm-1k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEXpg-0004Il-4Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEXpa-0001eT-Ae for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:33429) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VEXpZ-0001ab-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:58:10 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MS800K005PLGQ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:58:08 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MS800K3E5SV7990@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:58:08 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <83a9k2fo0x.fsf@gnu.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163072 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 07:16:30 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: tromey@redhat.com, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > Anyway, if that's true, threads will be much less useful than they > could be (e.g., fetching a large newsgroup while editing would be > impossible, right?). ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Should be "while running some CPU-intensive Lisp".