From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs trunk binary on Dropbox Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 20:48:03 +0300 Message-ID: <837gdwevcc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <86vc1htogy.fsf@somewhere.org> <86li2d5qfi.fsf@somewhere.org> <83bo39dlph.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380649697 31528 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2013 17:48:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 17:48:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sva-news@mygooglest.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dani Moncayo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 01 19:48:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VR43V-0004rq-6h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:48:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60392 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VR43U-0002bt-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:48:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VR43M-0002bI-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VR43H-0001vH-JA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]:65183) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VR43H-0001vB-Ah for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 13:48:03 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MU000F0041HUN00@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 20:48:02 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MU000FPZ441Q570@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 20:48:01 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.175 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163778 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 18:08:42 +0200 > From: Dani Moncayo > Cc: Sebastien Vauban , > Emacs development discussions > > > That's too bad, because now report-emacs-bug will not show the bzr > > revision, and whoever reads the bug report has no idea from which zip > > file the binary came. > > > > Please reconsider the decision, or provide some way for your builds to > > report the bzr revision. TIA. > > It would be nice if I could specify the bzr revno manually, for > example as a parameter to "configure" or "make", because having to > keep using bzr just for this little thing would also be too bad. You need to set the value of emacs-bzr-version (a string) during dumping.