From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16133: 24.3; copy-file fails on chmod when copying to FAT filesystem Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:57:49 +0200 Message-ID: <837gb7f8vm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vbysv8av.fsf@wizzle.ran.pp.ru> <87ob4jvj45.fsf@wizzle.ran.pp.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1387054691 9760 80.91.229.3 (14 Dec 2013 20:58:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ran@lasgalen.net, 16133@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Josh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 14 21:58:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHv-0000gP-O1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:58:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48579 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHv-0006K1-FQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:58:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33637) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHn-0006Ju-Eb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:58:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHi-0002o4-QU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:58:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36414) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHi-0002o0-NH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHi-0000Sr-E9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:58:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16133 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16133-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16133.13870546691763 (code B ref 16133); Sat, 14 Dec 2013 20:58:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16133) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Dec 2013 20:57:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50433 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHU-0000SM-DL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:57:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:61016) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VrwHR-0000S9-LG for 16133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 15:57:46 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MXT00L00E7F3100@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16133@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:57:44 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MXT00L7NE883300@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 14 Dec 2013 22:57:44 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81988 Archived-At: > From: Josh > Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:46:59 -0800 > Cc: Paul Eggert , Artem Chuprina , > 16133@debbugs.gnu.org > > On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Glenn Morris wrote: > > I don't know how we tidy this up for the future though. > > Add yet another optional argument "error-if-permissions-fail"? Yuck. > > It might be reasonable to error only when the existing > PRESERVE-UID-GID argument was non-nil. That argument has nothing to do with mode bits, which is what this bug is about.