From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: eww Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:28:37 +0200 Message-ID: <837g9ylja2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zjn0gmas.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvorbjuh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r48aaog5.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <878uui6cqr.fsf@yahoo.fr> <87k3e2ldpd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <52D56C90.7000902@yahoo.fr> <87y52ijufd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877ga172zi.fsf@igel.home> <52D6B310.8080702@yahoo.fr> <87y52f4wn7.fsf@igel.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389972531 19344 80.91.229.3 (17 Jan 2014 15:28:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 15:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@gnu.org, theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr, schwab@linux-m68k.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 17 16:28:57 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4BLt-0007gA-72 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 16:28:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38842 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4BLs-00024j-QD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:28:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48788) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4BLl-0001wT-Js for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:28:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4BLh-0005nK-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:28:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:40439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4BLb-0005mE-Tr; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:28:40 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZJ00H00X4B8U00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:28:38 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZJ00HFBXNP4W50@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:28:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168625 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:04:57 -0500 > Cc: bzg@gnu.org, theonewiththeevillook@yahoo.fr, > Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > What does it need, then? > > Nothing at all. This problem with etags exists already with many other > macros and noone cares. That's just life: etags is approximate, it > includes unneeded elements and lacks some elements it should have. > It is still 99% correct for Elisp, so some people use it very happily, > but there's no point uglifying the code just to try and make it work > 99.01% instead. If tagging those is important, we could use the --regex option to etags.