From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: inotify-based file notifications missing sometimes Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:34:22 +0300 Message-ID: <837fzo61s1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r3xwfx9q.fsf@secretsauce.net> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1414222513 5617 80.91.229.3 (25 Oct 2014 07:35:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2014 07:35:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dima Kogan , Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 25 09:35:07 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XhvsQ-0002BW-FK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 09:35:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XhvsP-0001TW-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:35:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53406) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhvs6-0001TE-VQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:34:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhvs1-0002OS-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:34:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]:53968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xhvs1-0002OI-C6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 03:34:41 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NDZ00300O53TA00@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:34:38 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NDZ003LQP1QTD20@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Sat, 25 Oct 2014 10:34:38 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87r3xwfx9q.fsf@secretsauce.net> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175810 Archived-At: > From: Dima Kogan > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 23:17:57 -0700 > > The main question is, why are monitoring the directory instead of the > objects we care about? AFAIR, it was to cover the use case described here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2013-01/msg00178.html Michael (CC'ed) might remember it better and in more detail.