From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:40:36 +0200 Message-ID: <837fys9wt7.fsf@gnu.org> References: <85a93pj1n5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87sihg7r73.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk> <87a93oilxl.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oas4h555.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87a93oh180.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83h9xw9zg3.fsf@gnu.org> <83d28k9yb9.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416336090 7694 80.91.229.3 (18 Nov 2014 18:41:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 18 19:41:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XqniM-0007cn-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:41:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqniM-0002GS-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:41:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57022) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqnhq-00029B-Rp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:41:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqnhk-00005v-Mj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:40:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:37808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqnhk-00005K-1P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:40:44 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NF800H00ZS57G00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:40:42 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NF800GEBZVUJM90@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:40:42 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.166 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177629 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 19:29:02 +0100 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > There's a C variable called running_asynch_code, but it's not exposed to > Lisp. Unless there's something else in there that can be used, should > we just export that to Lisp, like the `noninteractive' variable? Why do you need that exposed? If you want to know when some Lisp is run by a process filter, then make the filter function pass an argument to that Lisp saying it's run by a filter. Will that do?