From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 24.5 second release candidate Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:08:13 +0300 Message-ID: <837ftuqzrm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87619fvb9s.fsf@blueberry.home> <87384juhme.fsf@blueberry.home> <87zj6qtzch.fsf@blueberry.home> <20150402140228.GB23848@acm.fritz.box> <87y4matwhd.fsf@blueberry.home> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1427990940 14500 80.91.229.3 (2 Apr 2015 16:09:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, nicolas@petton.fr, rgm@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 02 18:08:52 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ydhfj-0006la-0v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:08:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ydhfi-0001X9-4v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:08:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48428) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdhfR-0001W6-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:08:33 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdhfM-0006kt-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:08:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:52361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YdhfM-0006jP-54; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:08:24 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NM600B00SP5RC00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:08:21 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NM600BJPSTVQH10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Apr 2015 19:08:20 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:184790 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:26:12 -0400 > Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel , > Glenn Morris > > >> Bug #20245 has happened: in it, in a C++ Mode buffer, bits of text are > >> randomly losing their fontification. > >> Would it be possible to delay the next release candidate until I've had a > >> chance perhaps to diagnose this? > > IIUC this is still a consequence of the fix to the "long union > highlighting" and that bug was a long standing bug. > > The change to CC-mode's font-lock bounds has obviously far reaching > consequences, so I think it should be reverted for 24.5. Yes, quite probably. Where can I find the description of that "long union highlighting" bug, please?