From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any idea why "make V=1" isn't working for me? Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:48:36 +0300 Message-ID: <837fmvt8gr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56189D23.4090707@cs.ucla.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444466931 14008 80.91.229.3 (10 Oct 2015 08:48:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 08:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 10 10:48:40 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkppY-0001A2-8d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 10:48:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44089 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkppX-00033a-NN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:48:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37849) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkppU-00033L-KQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:48:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkppP-0004m8-KC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:48:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:33712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkppP-0004m4-CO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 04:48:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NVZ00H00XEL1A00@mtaout27.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:44:35 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NVZ00665XMBZMA0@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 11:44:35 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <56189D23.4090707@cs.ucla.edu> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191096 Archived-At: > From: Paul Eggert > Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 22:07:47 -0700 > > Juanma Barranquero wrote: > > Shouldn't "make V=1" show the full command? > > Possibly it's your 'make' implementation. 'make V=1' is more-verbose only if > your 'make' groks nested variable expansions (a GNU extension to POSIX). If your > 'make' doesn't support this feature, the 'V=1' is ineffective, and you have to > enable verbosity at configure-time instead. By default, verbosity is disabled > because Emacs's configure.ac contains 'AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])'; if you are using > a non-GNU 'make' and want verbose output you can configure with './configure > --disable-silent-rules'. The MS-Windows build always uses GNU Make, so this is not the reason.