From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] widen-limits c331b66: Implement buffer-widen-limits functionality Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 05:38:44 +0200 Message-ID: <837fgs35q3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160322022539.16038.77264@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <8737riqouj.fsf@gmail.com> <221845e0-b194-433e-bfbc-105272ae5752@default> <87twjyp21k.fsf@gmail.com> <56F242E0.7060004@online.de> <877fgtpfrw.fsf@gmail.com> <56F293E7.2000703@online.de> <87a8lpnusg.fsf@gmail.com> <83r3f12oo5.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2D156.9040401@online.de> <83k2kt2i51.fsf@gnu.org> <56F2E643.4060903@online.de> <592bbafa-76ae-49d9-b5cd-644b3619a0d8@default> <87poukn8pl.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458790765 11723 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2016 03:39:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 03:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: andreas.roehler@online.de, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Vitalie Spinu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 24 04:39:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aiw7C-0003nI-2r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 24 Mar 2016 04:39:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47365 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiw7B-0004dv-4R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:39:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiw6y-0004dq-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiw6v-0002gR-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiw6v-0002gN-1Q; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:39:01 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2768 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aiw6t-0007Vn-6B; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:39:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <87poukn8pl.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Vitalie Spinu on Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:13:58 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202160 Archived-At: > From: Vitalie Spinu > Cc: Andreas Röhler , Eli > Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 23:13:58 +0100 > > The issue of prog-widen and prog-indentation-context was discussed extensively > in the thread that led to this diff. > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2016-03/threads.html#00859 > > Too long to be read from scratch I suppose. My takeaway is that those features > are raw and simplistic and bring more complications than they solve. Hopefully > there will be a common consensus to put those on hold for now. If that's the case, how come these features were admitted into our codebase? Should we rip them out, as long as it's not too late?