From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Certain numbers of special forms cause changing behaviour on function calls in --batch Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 10:13:25 +0300 Message-ID: <837fd5vnje.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8760stvwzp.fsf@web.de> <83r3bevhfc.fsf@gnu.org> <87inwq1ieb.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1467357463 16389 80.91.229.3 (1 Jul 2016 07:17:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 07:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 09:17:37 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bIshh-0003Je-Jm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 09:17:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54197 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIshY-0006O6-GR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:17:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIse6-0007a1-3B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:13:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIse0-0007gv-Uq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:13:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bIse0-0007gr-RU; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:13:44 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1293 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bIsdy-0004xq-3k; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 03:13:42 -0400 In-reply-to: <87inwq1ieb.fsf@web.de> (message from Michael Heerdegen on Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:22:36 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205016 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 23:22:36 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If that's the reason, setting line-move-visual to nil in the > > interactive session will produce the same "buggy" behavior. Does it? > > No, it gives me 10, the "nonbuggy" value. Then this theory eats dust. Which doesn't surprise me, because if it were the reason, I should have seen the same behavior on my system, as that behavior is deterministic.