From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: <837f5xbl0r.fsf@gnu.org> References: <52BDCC33-546C-4F47-A230-00EBC813B038@raeburn.org> <15CF14CC-C7DE-44BA-AC7D-F0BF1F160979@raeburn.org> <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <83eg05c32y.fsf@gnu.org> <87inphx29r.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83a8atbxl9.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1fpwu95.fsf@linux-m68k.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1484415493 3831 195.159.176.226 (14 Jan 2017 17:38:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 17:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 14 18:38:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cSSH6-0007r5-B3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 18:37:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48837 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSSHB-0004u9-28 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:38:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSSH2-0004ts-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:37:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSSGz-000635-Nu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:37:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:58415) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSSGz-000631-LG; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:37:49 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1254 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cSSGw-0007YI-Mu; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 12:37:49 -0500 In-reply-to: <87d1fpwu95.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:211287 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 16:12:22 +0100 > > >> It is as bogus as every Lisp error. > > > > On the contrary: most of them provide useful information about the > > error locus. This one clearly didn't. > > It accurately tells you the form that caused the error, something you > never get from a Lisp error. It's accurate, but utterly useless.