From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Emacs-26 threads problem [win64]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:09:38 +0300
Message-ID: <837ew2pxx9.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAFgFV9OFBZ5Fx7eFMjjc+pvO=SieHQvvH2iLmnGJhqcQkeyL_g@mail.gmail.com>
	<83h8v7r02e.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAFgFV9P2Srsy7LsGpW83_XrD0F-Xn1bv4M9iDC9=73j_gJb=eA@mail.gmail.com>
	<83vajnotik.fsf@gnu.org> <83r2ubosnd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAFgFV9OAXbd8vEW10-M=XkZG176DuKUqL7UFFE00WyWzRe4Hkg@mail.gmail.com>
	<83fuaqpzaq.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAFgFV9NwsW=xYLA8==1P7c21zrTpvfKCCd=hqO0nA-uwyPou-w@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507666229 27963 195.159.176.226 (10 Oct 2017 20:10:29 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 20:10:29 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 10 22:10:23 2017
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1e20qu-000573-8l
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 22:10:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36987 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1e20r1-00046W-ML
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:10:15 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46081)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1e20qr-00046M-MU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:10:06 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>) id 1e20qo-0000VY-Hb
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:10:05 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:33743)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1e20qo-0000VK-EL; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:10:02 -0400
Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:2707
	helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
	(Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
	id 1e20qm-0001XE-HP; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:10:02 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAFgFV9NwsW=xYLA8==1P7c21zrTpvfKCCd=hqO0nA-uwyPou-w@mail.gmail.com>
	(message from Fabrice Popineau on Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:58:35 +0200)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219360
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/219360>

> From: Fabrice Popineau <fabrice.popineau@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 21:58:35 +0200
> Cc: Emacs developers <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
> 
>  Does the problem go away if you insert at the beginning of each test a
>  loop like this:
> 
>  (while (> (length (all-threads)) 1)
>  (sleep-for 0.1))
> 
> This makes all the 28 tests pass.

And the address of stack_pos doesn't grow anymore?

> A bit scary though.

Why scary?