From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Question about memory usage Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:51:17 +0300 Message-ID: <837epo5u7u.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sh8c6byb.fsf@gnu.org> <838ta45upw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1522759805 29825 195.159.176.226 (3 Apr 2018 12:50:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:50:05 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 03 14:50:01 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1f3LNx-0007dQ-24 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 14:50:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60332 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3LQ0-000879-OB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:52:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42095) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3LP9-00084V-K0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:51:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3LP4-0000fP-75 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:51:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:41393) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1f3LP4-0000fK-1z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:51:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2562 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1f3LP3-0002QP-El for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:51:09 -0400 In-reply-to: <838ta45upw.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:40:27 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:116320 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 15:40:27 +0300 > From: Eli Zaretskii > > > From: Stefan Monnier > > Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 08:28:46 -0400 > > > > >> (while t > > >> (with-temp-buffer > > >> (setq buffer-undo-list nil) > > >> (insert "a"))) > > [...] > > > To answer your question: yes, I think this is expected, given that you > > > set buffer-undo-list to nil (what is the purpose of that, btw?). If > > > > Hmm... why would setting this var make any significant difference here? > > Because the variable is on/referenced via the stack, I suppose. Or maybe I misunderstand what you meant by "make significant difference"? What did you mean?