From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6861: 24.0.50; Scroll lock not bound Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 20:54:11 +0300 Message-ID: <837e77lo3g.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="199935"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: dak@gnu.org, 6861@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 20 19:55:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Lf-000pu1-D7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:55:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40142 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Le-0006oC-3q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:55:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56094) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i08LX-0006nX-U4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i08LW-0002AH-Og for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53303) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i08LW-0002A9-Lo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i08LW-0008Lf-HQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6861 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 6861-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6861.156632365632030 (code B ref 6861); Tue, 20 Aug 2019 17:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6861) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Aug 2019 17:54:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33891 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Kl-0008KY-R5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43656) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Kk-0008KL-2O for 6861@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Ke-0001ql-P6; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1921 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1i08Kd-0004p6-Rq; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 13:54:08 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:15:34 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:165431 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 19:15:34 +0200 > Cc: 6861@debbugs.gnu.org > > > David Kastrup writes: > > > >> I tried using the Scroll Lock Key, and got an error telling me it is > >> unbound. I figured out there was a library scroll-lock and loaded it. > >> The Scroll Lock Key still was unbound, though calling scroll-lock-mode > >> did what I would have expected to be on the scroll lock key. > >> > >> I suggest putting an appropriate autoloaded default global key > >> definition on the Scroll Lock Key, since nothing is gained by not > >> binding it to something useful. If a user happens to have his own > >> different definition, this will override the default anyway. > > > > That sounds reasonable to me. It should be a small job to do it. > > Does anyone disagree with such a change? > > If there are no objections, I'll install the attached patch in a couple of days. What about w32-scroll-lock-modifier?