From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42383: 28.0.50; Two bugs with M-x compile Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 11:22:50 +0300 Message-ID: <837dv1i65h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83h7u7lcaf.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh7zrvf6.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28396"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: ghe@sdf.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 42383-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Branham Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 18 10:24:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi8h-0007IP-Nm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 10:24:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55386 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi8g-0004OY-9D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi8Y-0004Ne-KK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi8Y-0006Tr-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:24:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi8Y-0005ak-7P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:24:02 -0400 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 42383 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Mail-Followup-To: 42383@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, ghe@sdf.org Original-Received: via spool by 42383-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D42383.159506059721433 (code D ref 42383); Sat, 18 Jul 2020 08:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42383-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jul 2020 08:23:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58400 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7p-0005ZY-DB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:50994) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7h-0005Z9-Vs; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7b-0006KG-Jn; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2165 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jwi7Z-0006cR-Mh; Sat, 18 Jul 2020 04:23:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zh7zrvf6.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alex Branham on Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:39:57 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183166 Archived-At: unarchive 10417 reopen 10417 unarchive 34330 reopen 34330 thanks > From: Alex Branham > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Gregory Heytings , > 42383@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 17:39:57 -0400 > > > yet, `pcomplete-completions-at-point` is supposed to perform filename > > completion also (via `pcomplete-default-completion-function`), so > > I think `pcomplete-completions-at-point` should come first and I suspect > > that the problem in bug#34330 is internal to pcomplete and the above > > commit just worked around it. > > I find pcomplete really confusing (why is it that there's a whole second > kind of completion framework outside completion-at-point?). But yes, > sounds like this should be reverted. I didn't notice this regression > since I use ivy which obviates the need to re-complete after typing a > letter. > > Someone will need to reopen bugs #10417 and #34330. OK, thanks. I've reverted the change and reopened those two bugs.