From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46609: Fix shell password prompt in minibuffer (bug 43302) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 17:01:53 +0200 Message-ID: <837dn55sim.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87czwytbxq.fsf@protonmail.com> <83eehd5tjf.fsf@gnu.org> <87czwxwhys.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18985"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rprior@protonmail.com, 46609@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 18 16:03:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkpq-0004qE-Qk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:03:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58554 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkpp-0007GD-Ps for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:03:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkof-0006vx-Ja for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkoc-0001rb-DM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:02:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkoc-0000g3-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46609 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 46609-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46609.16136605092585 (code B ref 46609); Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46609) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Feb 2021 15:01:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkoP-0000fd-65 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46360) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkoN-0000fQ-RN for 46609@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:01:48 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkoI-0001k5-I9; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:01:42 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2531 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lCkoF-0005eJ-V3; Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:01:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87czwxwhys.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:47:39 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200266 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Ryan Prior , 46609@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:47:39 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > >> I am not a Unicode expert and don't know if there might be undesirable > >> side-effects from using :space: instead of :blank:. However, in my > >> manual testing these change give me the exact behavior I'm after. > > > > I'm a bit worried by the [[:space:]]* part: it would match any number > > of newlines and ^L characters, right? Is that what we want here? > > I think so -- matching "Password: \n\n" makes as much sense as matching > "Password: \n", I think? It actually happens in Real Life? What bothers me is that we could takes something unrelated as a password prompt.