From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49788: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Package archive location needs to be absolute Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 20:02:16 +0300 Message-ID: <837dh1kusn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6m3b7wj.fsf@dick> <87v94llhjg.fsf@gnus.org> <83o8adl8eb.fsf@gnu.org> <87im0ljs61.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34158"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: larsi@gnus.org, dick.r.chiang@gmail.com, 49788@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 04 20:19:56 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBLUi-0008jt-40 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 20:19:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40882 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBLUg-0001Dj-TI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 14:19:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKIJ-0003Hb-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:03:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKII-0002E6-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKIH-0002Wf-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:03:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:03:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49788 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 49788-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49788.16280965549670 (code B ref 49788); Wed, 04 Aug 2021 17:03:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49788) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Aug 2021 17:02:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45059 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKHp-0002Vs-QI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:02:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52032) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKHn-0002Vf-Rf for 49788@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKHf-0001rA-Ru; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3745 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mBKHd-0002d4-96; Wed, 04 Aug 2021 13:02:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:51:36 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:211178 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , dick.r.chiang@gmail.com, > 49788@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 12:51:36 -0400 > > Lars Ingebrigtsen [2021-08-04 14:44:22] wrote: > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> ??? The conclusion from the discussion was that the patch is simply > >> wrong, AFAIU. See > >> > >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49788#11 > >> > >> So, unless I completely misunderstood what Stefan was saying, I think > >> this should be reverted. > > I interpreted Stefan's comment to say that Dick's patch was correct, > > which is the opposite interpretation, so we need a tie breaker: > > Stefan? :-) > > The patch looks fine to me. Sorry for my misunderstanding.