From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add an option to not reduce vocabulary of the Japanese Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 17:17:33 +0300 Message-ID: <837d5t98qq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r142ypnq.fsf@gnu.org> <878rqa9cm8.fsf@taiju.info> <87k09tubfa.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3377"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: higashi@taiju.info, handa@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 16:22:50 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nyDd3-0000dZ-Vx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 16:22:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39388 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyDd3-0000iu-0H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyDY9-0001Cv-En for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:17:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyDY9-0004wK-3l; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:17:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Q0zyDE+u8sNkPgjtBS7a+gAN/sXiJFIIDDB2Mb9dtk8=; b=S5PN3tdKsqCX 2qmu1g9cY+w8Ntf/xiuUvIlLhesx2kdR04jPh+0f4oxlX0+qz82vz1HhTaVGGb9JyBzBWPIiz/Deo zPjDU6iGcbUp5YkFPDk1wBPoZBnUinyjUVrNWPTWI9QSocxS4N4HIHBWJmZk/prjg8T0C95t4IEiO iVF+bpLFMeyyXBf2ssS389V3uBLGHkqyke4rzjDloR+3AvF4ptWsRwkDdmgfWX4MJLtDSlc3qiB7b Or9CMBYoSguZ9IkX0JPCBPupZ/M6FLui9dsBBZUWM5Q7SKF4VlgueZFkhcDEugLS0seFyfqzfyPSg 4hiyWm0OmLkev1BRdQg5yA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2454 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nyDY8-0007vS-OR; Mon, 06 Jun 2022 10:17:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k09tubfa.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 06 Jun 2022 16:14:01 +0200) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290799 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: handa , eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 16:14:01 +0200 > > Taiju HIGASHI writes: > > > I have also received a suggestion to make it a run-time option instead > > of a build-time option, is it possible to get some opinion on that? > > > > Because I cannot see how many users would want a dictionary with a reduced > > vocabulary. > > I think if everybody agrees that nobody would want a reduced dictionary, > then we should just stop reducing the dictionary -- no > configuration/run-time options necessary. I think a configuration option, by default off, is a good way of removing the reduction, but still leaving someone who may want that a "fire escape". The cost in complexity is quite small in this case.