From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-devel/debbugs communication (was: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode) Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 11:53:49 +0300 Message-ID: <837cp78wo2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83350ncbns.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <97224c4f-fad4-ae01-46c1-5755d97d9a92@gutov.dev> <87fs3ztq38.fsf@localhost> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87y1hroz47.fsf@posteo.net> <87wmx7mzcf.fsf@localhost> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="27770"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 03 10:54:31 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qcisJ-00071u-NR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 10:54:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcis6-0002mf-MG; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:54:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcis5-0002mW-Hd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:54:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qcis5-0002Zo-98; Sun, 03 Sep 2023 04:54:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=9G0cZHY0HBZUeszKeuduzITvd5CXs65Ojdqg934IX7g=; b=KuWBl1FWWNCj 64AHQ642SrX5usNAhAl0v6U1l/lDTgyg4ciwehGpEBcVafvyCYt6P8l111TaVPvicEVm0hszpkJaA Atq8wJ1tTfUwreoowyaKRPLnZm7uyMPXSH08sodhaem41goo1tqHS6I8v+s6cezOiEPFwVWqL+ETJ VPOjWzMKYfJFjSX4SZQ1L6GJMb4LMIXkwMBwlPSWjHnMqVSVcBmWjKPZ5bbOJC5wIi0ijLc6y3Kyd KvyrnWqRS3K315Mo3F6UbdxCjpHMQHasTX/HgXtsutnyj/nQQEwaZ+46jiumXMNet81n1PdMGMjBD s7cxVFWVuCJa8l4ONvZKQA==; In-Reply-To: <87wmx7mzcf.fsf@localhost> (message from Ihor Radchenko on Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:32:16 +0000) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309944 Archived-At: > From: Ihor Radchenko > Cc: Jens Schmidt , emacs-devel@gnu.org, > manuel.uberti@inventati.org > Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2023 08:32:16 +0000 > > Richard Stallman writes: > > > > Exactly. TBH I still have to assemble courage to post here. All these > > > top dogs with their super-dry yet elaborate communication style are > > > surely, um, intimidating. > > > > That is not a good thing. Maybe we can continue on the path of the Kind > > Communication Guidelines (https://gnu.org/philosophy/kind-communication.html) > > to make emacs-devel less intimidating. > > > > Would you like to start accumulating a list of examples that do, > > or did in the past, feel intimidating to you? We could learn ommething > > from that. > > I can share some subjective experience: Thanks, but I think this kind of discussion should be moved to emacs-tangents. It is not really relevant to Emacs development, and I find discussing people's styles of posting here not appropriate for this list, unless the style is completely unacceptable (in which case we usually immediately ask the poster on the list to drop the attitude, and no discussions should be necessary anyway).