From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cleanup of byte-compiled files missing? Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:28:55 +0200 Message-ID: <8362xlq9q0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83sk12w8iw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286008144 30534 80.91.229.12 (2 Oct 2010 08:29:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 02 10:29:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1xSn-00020x-Es for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:29:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56291 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1xSm-0007cm-I4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:29:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44767 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1xSe-0007bv-Qg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:28:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1xSd-0002fa-Rw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:60835) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1xSd-0002ex-IP; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:28:51 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L9N00700M72GC00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:28:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.77.74]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L9N006XJM81N1E0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:28:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131223 Archived-At: fatal_error_signal now says: if (sig == SIGTERM || sig == SIGHUP || sig == SIGINT) Fkill_emacs (make_number (sig)); Shouldn't the SIGINT part require noninteractive to be non-zero, just to be on the safe side?