From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9209: bidi slowdown Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 06:03:43 +0300 Message-ID: <8362mjcfsg.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312081444 9352 80.91.229.12 (31 Jul 2011 03:04:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 03:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9209@debbugs.gnu.org To: emacs user Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 31 05:03:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJl-0001Wb-9Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 05:03:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52580 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJk-0008BS-Iw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:03:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55992) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJh-0008BB-T5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:03:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJh-0003le-2u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJg-0003la-Tp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:03:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJu-00015q-OR; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:04:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 03:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9209 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9209-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9209.13120814284182 (code B ref 9209); Sun, 31 Jul 2011 03:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9209) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jul 2011 03:03:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJg-00015P-B8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:03:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout23.012.net.il ([80.179.55.175]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QnMJd-00015F-Mo for 9209@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout23.012.net.il by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LP600200G146600@a-mtaout23.012.net.il> for 9209@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 06:03:30 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.228.48.51]) by a-mtaout23.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LP600223GHT6O10@a-mtaout23.012.net.il>; Sun, 31 Jul 2011 06:03:30 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:04:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49736 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 22:35:25 -0400 > From: emacs user > > when using vm, I still see significant slowdowns in cursor motion in > the vm-summary buffer when bidi is on. this is with a 3000+ lines > long buffer with the summary of the messages in the inbox. please let > me know if there is any additional information I can provide. Yes, I need an example of the buffer text. Also, does it matter whether point is near the beginning or the end of the buffer (or in any other particular place)? In general, the bidi display _is_ slower, because it does more, but I hope to get it to be tolerable. Thanks.