bug#7842: acknowledged by developer (control message for bug 7842)

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: jrollins@finestructure.net,  7842@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 12:25:22 -0500
> 
> >> and already separates stdout from stderr.
> > stderr is put on a file when separated.
> 
> Still, it disproves the statement that "It is impossible to separate the
> standard output and standard error streams of the subprocess".

The statement is that it is impossible to do that without involving
files.

> > The OP seems to object to a solution that would use files, or else he
> > would have used make-temp-file himself.
> 
> He mentions 4 problems with the current situation:
> 
> > * The first touches the disk, the second does not.
> 
> Providing a wrapper that does make-temp-file doesn't solve this point,
> indeed.
> 
> > * The first requires me to pick a temporary file name that does not
> >   collide with an existing file on disk, the second does not.
> > * The first requires me to cleanup a temporary file, the second does
> >   not.
> > * The first is 45 characters long, the second is 13.
> 
> But the wrapper would solve all those 3 remaining points (because the
> wrapper would pay this cost, not Jameson).

Again, the example in
http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7842#33 explicitly
rejects use of any temporary files altogether.

If the Jameson would like to rephrase his position, I'm all ears.