From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to restore the layout? Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:02:35 +0300 Message-ID: <8361wyfkwk.fsf@gnu.org> References: <51C5AA68.4000204@alice.it> <51C8B2C8.4000803@gmx.at> <51C93CDB.2020301@gmx.at> <51C9C790.3020407@gmx.at> <51CA0D4C.7080204@alice.it> <51CC3E42.7020409@alice.it> <51CC4CC1.3030202@alice.it> <51CC8403.1030009@gmx.at> <51CCA56A.8000508@gmx.at> <51CD49CF.1090103@gmx.at> <51CD5489.10902@gmx.at> <83d2r6fsbw.fsf@gnu.org> <51CD7879.1030906@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1372424619 22807 80.91.229.3 (28 Jun 2013 13:03:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen.berman@gmx.net, angelo.graziosi@alice.it, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, kjambunathan@gmail.com To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 28 15:03:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UsYKw-0007Th-IM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 15:03:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34547 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsYKw-0001lT-58 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:03:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsYKr-0001i0-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:03:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsYKm-0007IQ-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:03:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:56198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsYKm-0007I8-82 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 09:03:28 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MP300K00TGF1800@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:02:41 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MP300JW5TKDFY90@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 16:02:37 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <51CD7879.1030906@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 80.179.55.172 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:161198 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 13:50:17 +0200 > From: martin rudalics > CC: Jan Dj=E4rv ,=20 > angelo.graziosi@alice.it, lekktu@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,= =20 > monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, stephen.berman@gmx.net,=20 > kjambunathan@gmail.com >=20 > We already earlier agreed with Juanma that this will only restore > the default frame size of the present session. Then there are no more problems (and I don't understand what was that discussion about, but I don't have to). > > Just make sure we re-create all those frames, and if they need t= o be > > resized or moved, be it by the window manager or manually, so be= it. > > It will already be a great improvement from what we had before, > > whereby users would have manually recreate every frame. >=20 > I think we should do what can be done easily, like restoring the la= st > previous sizes (as Juanma does already). If they can be restored, yes. If they can't, leave them at the size the window manager manages to produce.