From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15898: Emacs aborts in buf_charpos_to_bytepos Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:39:18 +0200 Message-ID: <8361rtipqh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ppq2i06d.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384533614 25887 80.91.229.3 (15 Nov 2013 16:40:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15898@debbugs.gnu.org, control@debbugs.gnu.org To: Barry OReilly Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 15 17:40:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMRO-0001ZK-7t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:40:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32774 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMRN-0005Ox-K0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMRF-0005Nw-Hc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMR9-0007ul-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42111) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMR9-0007u0-Fx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMR8-0007gr-4q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15898 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15898-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15898.138453358229523 (code B ref 15898); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15898) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Nov 2013 16:39:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56128 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMQo-0007g6-4R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:39:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:51801) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VhMQl-0007fn-6K; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:39:40 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MWB00900CI54200@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:39:32 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MWB008MCCXWXY80@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:39:32 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:80604 Archived-At: merge 15898 15841 thanks > Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:25:16 -0500 > From: Barry OReilly > Cc: 15898@debbugs.gnu.org > > > This looks like another duplicate of 15841, but that would imply > > that your previous update was before revno 115033, which was > > committed quite some time ago. Can you tell if that was indeed so? > > That's correct, I updated from before revno 115033 to after it. Thanks. In that case, perhaps you, too, could try the patch I suggested there just a few minutes ago.