From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: w32/w64 Emacs and gmalloc() Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:05:44 +0200 Message-ID: <8361nxvlon.fsf@gnu.org> References: <831tymwge8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393697157 32331 80.91.229.3 (1 Mar 2014 18:05:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 01 19:06:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoIW-000402-Jb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 19:06:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60495 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoIV-0002Z9-St for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoIO-0002W5-LZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:06:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoIJ-0002zX-GH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:05:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:53292) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJoIJ-0002zC-8I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 13:05:51 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N1R00L00RAUX600@mtaout29.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:08:51 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N1R00LR6RQRFK20@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:08:51 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170008 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: fabrice.popineau@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 10:50:18 -0500 > > I'm just pointing out that it can be improved a bit by exposing the > "freeable_p" test and use it in sweep_foo so we don't even try to > free blocks when the free would be ignored. Along the lines of the > patch below. Will this handle all the calls to xrealloc we have in the sources?