From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we make set_point_both less expensive? Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:23:05 +0200 Message-ID: <8361a029p2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <5505E34C.4000106@dancol.org> <838uex1u1m.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1426523026 4460 80.91.229.3 (16 Mar 2015 16:23:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 16:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 16 17:23:38 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXnf-0003de-Gk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 17:23:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50450 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXne-0001SL-Kh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:23:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXnZ-0001Pb-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:23:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXnU-0006Rs-Nh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:23:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout28.012.net.il ([80.179.55.184]:54807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YXXnU-0006Rc-Gi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 12:23:20 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout28.012.net.il by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NLB00I00BZOP600@mtaout28.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:21:52 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout28.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NLB00GQBC4GDU10@mtaout28.012.net.il>; Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:21:52 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.184 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:183909 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: dancol@dancol.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 08:47:47 -0400 > > what users of those features normally want is to catch movement of > the cursor You mean, we should do this in redisplay? Wouldn't that be a radical change in semantics? In particular, if redisplay doesn't run, neither will the hooks.