From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20943: 25.0.50; Dired buffers are not always auto-reverted Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 17:47:35 +0300 Message-ID: <83615tv14o.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y4j1oy87.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87pp41cvl1.fsf@openmailbox.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1436453307 24532 80.91.229.3 (9 Jul 2015 14:48:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:48:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20943@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark Karpov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 09 16:48:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD7U-0003OM-Ux for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 16:48:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD7T-00020w-No for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD7P-00020n-PO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD7K-000705-Oa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD7K-000700-Ke for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD7K-0003Dr-E5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:48:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:48:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20943 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20943-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20943.143645326812365 (code B ref 20943); Thu, 09 Jul 2015 14:48:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20943) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2015 14:47:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45286 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD75-0003DM-DP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:47:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout27.012.net.il ([80.179.55.183]:58075) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZDD72-0003D8-PP for 20943@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 10:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout27.012.net.il by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NR800G0065CV600@mtaout27.012.net.il> for 20943@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 17:44:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout27.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NR80053469ZBUC0@mtaout27.012.net.il>; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 17:44:23 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87pp41cvl1.fsf@openmailbox.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:104850 Archived-At: > From: Mark Karpov > Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 19:24:42 +0600 > > > Any update/decision on this issue? I'm using this for almost a week now > and it feels all right. Dired now is much more interactive, the problem > of staled buffers is gone. We need to come up with a way of telling auto-revert that although the buffer was modified by the commands you mentioned, it's okay to revert it. Can you suggest a change along those lines?