From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New ELPA policy proposal Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:36:37 +0200 Message-ID: <836119n756.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <87611bh19q.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <83vb9bm9tp.fsf@gnu.org> <87lha6e2n1.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447173439 995 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 16:37:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ohwoeowho@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: John Wiegley Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 17:37:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBun-0005s5-7G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:37:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33971 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBum-0001UF-OD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBuU-0001U7-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:36:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBuO-0006sW-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:50609) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwBuO-0006sK-HQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 11:36:36 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NXL00600XUIHG00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:35:55 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NXL00NPPY3VYM70@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 18:35:55 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 80.179.55.185 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193884 Archived-At: > From: John Wiegley > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org > Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 06:24:15 -0800 > > >>>>> Oleh Krehel writes: > > >> Why not have only one distribution, the full one? > > > If fine with it, if that's what we agree upon. Some people might still care > > about bandwidth. I don't. But we do offer emacs-24.5.tar.gz and > > emacs-24.5.tar.xz variants currently, I assume it's for the purposes of > > bandwidth. > > I'd be fine with just one "full distribution" too, unless there are other > strong objections. It ought to be a difference of tens of megabytes at most. emacs-24.5.tar.xz is 38MB. IMO, that's not "large" by any measure nowadays.