From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tags-loop-continue Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:08:39 +0200 Message-ID: <8360z1mkfc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wprimto9.fsf@gnu.org> <56916C10.6050004@yandex.ru> <83oacumqmj.fsf@gnu.org> <56917246.1010800@yandex.ru> <5691795E.9010008@yandex.ru> <83lh7ym725.fsf@gnu.org> <5691D768.3020908@yandex.ru> <83bn8tmnvq.fsf@gnu.org> <56928356.2000609@yandex.ru> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452445740 18339 80.91.229.3 (10 Jan 2016 17:09:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 17:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 10 18:08:55 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aIJU6-0007Kx-Nl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 18:08:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48011 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIJU5-0002uv-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:08:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIJTs-0002uj-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:08:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIJTo-0000v4-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:08:40 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aIJTo-0000v0-Ri; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:08:36 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3175 helo=HOME-C4E4A596F7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aIJTo-0006w1-2x; Sun, 10 Jan 2016 12:08:36 -0500 In-reply-to: <56928356.2000609@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:14:14 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197982 Archived-At: > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 19:14:14 +0300 > Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > I didn't talk about tags-search, I'm talking only about > > tags-loop-continue. > > Because tags-query-replace uses a special keymap, we can bind > tags-loop-continue to M-, in it. _Maybe_ we can similarly use a new > keymap during tags-search's execution. > > If you think it's a good idea, I can look into it. I think it should be okay, thanks. As long as the command is interactive, it can always be rebound, if users so want. > On the flip side, the users may get confused that M-, is bound to > different commands in different contexts. But the current binding of M-, makes no sense while tags-search is on-going, I think. So it sounds like a good compromise to me.